Government security agencies should use surveillance cameras and identification software to monitor our moments because it is for our own good.
Question Preview:The goal of this exercise is for you to understand both sides of an issue. Students should discuss the strength of the opposing argument of the entire opposing team, not just the opposite speaker. As well as quoting the references used by opponents in their debate, each individual should include discussion from four extra articles from peer-reviewed journals to support their discussion. You may use these to reinforce any part of your short counterargument paper. For instance, if the opponent team made what are seemingly goodpoints— but supported this with a relatively weak or biased refe...
Installation of surveillance cameras and other software to track down the movements of people are part of the security process. These processes are intended for the betterment of the people. However, certain criticisms are there against such processes. This essay will discuss the points categorically and strength of such arguments are discussed below.
The strength of an opponent’s argument: Using surveillance cameras is a debated topic. According to the security agencies, the surveillance cameras are used to track down the movements of the people and this helps to keep a close vigil over the suspects or suspicious things. However, many critics are considered this matter as an invasion of privacy. According to them, the moral views of civil liberties are affected by these cameras. Every person has the right to privacy and installation of surveillance cameras are attempted to invade those privacies. Further, it has been contended by the critics that the statement that surveillance cameras could reduce the rate of crime is a myth and according to them, the security agencies are trying to keep an eye on the common people. Apart from the cameras, certain soft wares are used to monitor daily activities. The intention may be good, but the implementation process is not correct. It is not a fact that every person is criminal and excessive use of those cameras is trying to snatch the basic rights of the public. Hacking poses a great threat in this regard. It has been observed that hackers are stealing or copying data from personal computers and even the government agencies are liable in this regard. No one has any right to see or encroach over the personal data or property of others. However, the securities are alleged to commit these offenses in the name of public safety, which are required to be stopped. Further, the agencies are, in certain times, used drones in private places and this can be regarded as a sheer invasion of privacy. According to Schumann, Moosbrugger, and Rozier (2015), using the cameras and oft wares could pose a serious threat against cybersecurity. Khan et al. (2017) opined that certain communicative restrictions are required to be imposed on the securities agencies.
This report aimed to develop a critical understating of the various accounting software by evaluating the cloud-based accounting software in regards to businesses and then suggest the most appropriate accounting software to a chosen company such as Woolworth. The findings of the current report reflected that the company has key activities like manage, organize, maintain its store staff, develop various strategies for the business, billing for their products, maintain their transactions, and records them and handle their conflicts, etc. Similarly, its other activities related to revenue and expenditure cycle also includes sales and purchase related practices. Moreover, some internal controls are found weak in Woolworth due to which company has risks like segregation of duties, major frauds, poor corporate governance, improper monitoring of managerial opportunistic behavior.