These two social work intervention theories, the task-centred approach, and the Crisis Intervention Method are evaluated and assessed for their implications and applicability in social work practice.
Social professionals are frequently asked to assist people in coping with various life challenges. Every human being faces crises at some point in their lives (Roberts, 2000, p 11). According to the crisis hypothesis, problems are inevitable. These crises might be abrupt, like a family sickness or job loss, or gradual, like school or aging (Roberts, 2000, p 11). Individuals try to cope with crises using existing mechanisms but run into issues when those mechanisms fail or when old problems resurface. Social professionals are frequently relied upon to assist persons in the situation (Roberts, 2000, p 11).
In social work, the task-centred approach is progressive and goal-oriented. It is a research-based practice-based method applied in various contexts and scenarios (Nash et al., 2005, p 33). It is a social work strategy that assists clients in completing problem-solving activities within specified time frames. It is systematic, problem-focused, and time-limited (Nash et al., 2005, p 33).
Task-cantered crisis intervention is typically clubbed together, and Malcolm Payne (1991, p 4) sees a lot of overlap between crisis intervention and task-centred therapy. Both strategies are problem-solving, short-term, and based on learning theory.
This essay examines and evaluates these two ideas, focusing on their commonalities, contrasts, and significance to social work practice. The impact of the anti-oppressive course is considered.
According to the crisis hypothesis, people need to settle their crises to deal with new changes and problems (Aguilera, 1998, p 47). Inability to resolve previous concerns increases vulnerability to current situations. Individuals who develop new abilities to deal with crises are better prepared to deal with future problems (Aguilera, 1998, p 47). Humans are capable of managing challenging situations well. People only become involved in crises when their psychological, emotional, social, spiritual, or physical resources are inadequate to deal with stressful situations or occurrences. Difficult or stressful experiences do not cause crises (Aguilera, 1998, p 47). Individuals' reactions to stressful situations or events affect the severity of a problem. Emergencies occur when people see events as substantial and frightening yet cannot cope with them using their typical coping techniques (Aguilera, 1998, p 47).
People in distress frequently have few options and are open to outside help (Roberts, 2000, p 19). Providing expert assistance by social workers during crises can help people learn new skills, modify bad habits, and recover stability. Crises empower people and prepare them for future problems (Roberts, 2000, p 19).
Crisis intervention is a time-limited professional approach used to support people, families, and groups (Hepworth et al., 2002, p 83). Social workers assess people's readiness to learn new skills and coping methods. Human service workers employ social resources to assist persons in returning to their earlier functioning levels as quickly as feasible (Hepworth et al., 2002, p 83). In addition to "listening", social workers also "validate", "accept", "normalise", "reassure", "educate", "ad (Nash et al, 2005, p 38). Crisis intervention is divided into seven stages: (a) communication with individuals to improve circumstances; (b) assessment of the situation; (c) exploration of available strengths and resources; (d) goal setting using these strengths and resources; (e) implementation of the plan, teaching new skills and mobilizing other support as needed; and (f) evaluation and adjustment of the plan (Hepworth et al., 2002, p 83).
Because social workers are constantly asked to assist people in distress, crisis intervention skills are vital (Roberts, 2000, p 19). Social workers may face clients with varying needs, necessitating research, strategic planning, and person-centred care (Roberts, 2000, p 19). Professional crisis intervention practice requires confidentiality and emotional distance (Roberts, 2000, p 19).
The task-centred approach arose due to traditional casework procedures' delayed and ineffective outcomes (Reid, 1997, p 134). Due to resource constraints, lack of focus, and uncertain products, standard social work casework procedures were deemed ineffective (Reid, 1997, p 134). To address this, Reid and Shyne conducted considerable research in the late 1960s and established the task-cantered approach to social work practice, which called for a brief but concentrated interventions. As a facilitator, the social worker focuses on the client (Reid, 1997, p 134). The task-oriented approach helped customers swiftly improve their issues. Thus the technique was immediately replicated and developed in the UK (Reid, 1997, p 134).
The task-centred approach is a systematic process where the social worker first helps the client articulates their difficulties (Hepworth et al., 2002, p 87). The social worker then helps the client define and break down the issues, pointing out critical areas for action (Hepworth et al., 2002, p 87). Finally, the social worker encourages clients to categorize and prioritize their issues (Naleppa & Reid, 1998, p 63). The social worker and client then work together to (a) set goals, (b) negotiate contracts, and (c) monitor and evaluate progress. Task-cantered social workers should be able to engage and empower clients (Hepworth et al., 2002, p 87).
These two techniques seem to mesh well in theory and practice (Watson et al., 2002, p 96). These strategies are successful with a broad spectrum of clients in social work research. Both ideas arose in reaction to the seeming ineffectiveness of psychodynamic casework procedures (Watson et al., 2002, p 96). Both techniques emphasize quick, short-term treatments. They are based on problem-solving and learning theory (Watson et al., 2002, p 96).
The task-centred approach, like other approaches, has limitations. It is based on the rationality of clients and their desire to cooperate with social workers (Nash et al., 2005, p 53). In addition, it requires agency backing. Despite these flaws, the two techniques are beneficial, especially in building empowerment and combating oppression (Nash et al., 2005, p 53). The strategies provide new skills to service users, allowing them to manage future instances of hardship and tyranny (Nash et al., 2005, p 53).
Many elements impact social work practice, including service consumers, social workers, agencies, and society.
Numerous circumstances impact the attitude of individual workers, leaving them perplexed and seeking advice in their role of supporting service consumers in need. The task-cantered method and crisis intervention theory allow service users to analyze their actual situations, participate in organized, time-bound problem solving and confront and overcome injustice. However, social workers must recognize the consequences of these ideas and avoid classifying all challenging circumstances as task-focused or critical interventions. Understanding and using these ideas will significantly assist them in their practice settings.
Our academic professionals are here to provide online assignment help. From short essay proposals to complete dissertations, we offer a service to suit your demands.