An organization's culture is its prevailing set of norms and assumptions about how things should be done. The core of an organization's culture may be summed up by its features, which include member identification, group emphasis, people focus, unit integration, control, risk tolerance, reward criteria, conflict tolerance, means-end orientation, and a concentration on open systems. Using these 10 criteria to evaluate the company provides a holistic portrait of the company's culture.
On the other hand, some of our cultural traditions are very powerful, while others are rather weak. When the values and beliefs of a business are widely held and strongly impact employee behaviour, the culture can be said to be strong. Organizations with a robust culture establish principles that are both consistent and explicit, and they then assume that all employees will strongly identify with and support those values.
Denison names mission, consistency, engagement, and adaptability as the four essential characteristics of a successful company.
Research has found that companies with strong cultures have more aligned employees, which in turn leads to greater productivity.
Some studies have shown, however, that while strong cultures are associated with greater short-term success, they can also hinder long-term organisational performance and even lead to long-term failure by limiting an organization's ability to adapt to novel circumstances.
Culture defines the overt and covert behaviours of an organisation and how and when change is implemented (Schein, 1985). (Smollan, 2009). Another way to define culture is as a shared mental framework (Hofstede, 2005). The breadth of culture may be reduced to two components, argues Jan Vom (2011): Manifestation of culture (1) (2) the extent of the cited organisation.
Indications of cultural influence
The culture of an organisation is reflected in its overt practises and policies (Jan Vom, 2011). Culture manifests itself on three levels: artefacts, values, and assumptions (Schein, 2004 as quoted in Jan Vom, 2011).
Business symbols, goods, buildings, fashion, habits, and rituals are all outward manifestations of a company's culture. Establishing a link between objects and principles is crucial.
Less obvious than core values, espoused ones include the publicly stated plans, goals, standards, and regulations that serve as the organization's everyday operational ideology.
Assumptions about the structure of time and space, the function of social hierarchies, and the weight given to work, family, and personal development are just a few examples of basic underlying assumptions that are an unconscious component of any society. These are the bedrock from which all cultural expressions are derived.
the range of the organisation being cited
A person's reference group consists of those he or she interacts with on a regular basis in the course of doing work, whether that be coworkers or managers (Lawrence, 2006).
As a result, the individuals themselves serve as the cultural framework in which the term "group" is used. Cultural boundaries are established with respect to the group being used as a point of reference (Jan Vom, 2011).
Many authors have offered their own unique definitions of "organisational culture." According to Deshpande and Webster (1989), an organization's culture is its "pattern of shared values and ideas that help employees comprehend organisational functioning and so provide standards for behaviour inside the company."
However, others, like Schein (1985), argue that culture is better understood as a psychological tendency—what he calls 'basic assumptions'—that is picked up by an organization's members as they work to solve the challenges of external adaptation and internal integration, is accepted as true because it has proven effective, and is then taught to new members.
Regardless of the definition we choose, it is clear that a company's culture has a significant impact on its performance and the likelihood that its members will be able to carry out the company's objectives (Pottruck, 2001).
According to Dwivedi (1995), citing Chantman and Chaldwell (1991), the 10 fundamental traits that, taken together, represent the core of an organization's culture are as follows:
Employees' sense of belonging to the company as a whole, as opposed to any particular department or function within it.
The extent to which tasks at work are organised around teams as opposed to individuals.
When making decisions, managers should think about how those choices will affect employees.
Unit integration refers to the extent to which different sections of an organisation are pushed to work together or as a whole.
The extent to which workers' actions are monitored and governed by a combination of formal policies and procedures and informal forms of supervision.
Tolerance for risk is the extent to which workers are pushed to take calculated risks in pursuit of new and better ways of doing things.
Compensation and advancement opportunities should be based on demonstrated merit rather than seniority, favouritism, or other non-performance reasons.
Tolerance for conflict refers to the degree to which disagreements and critiques may be spoken openly in the workplace.
The degree to which management prioritises results over attention to the means by which those goals are achieved is known as a "means-ends orientation."
Open-systems thinking refers to how closely an organisation keeps tabs on and adapts to its external surroundings.
One may learn about the culture of a company by looking for these indicators, which mirror the values held by the company. Depending on how powerful it is, it can increase efficiency within a company (Dwivedi, 1995).
The extent to which strong cultures boost organisational performance, however, has been called into question by certain scholars. Denison (1990) found that companies with robust cultures had higher ROIs, but only in the near term; the correlation between cultural stability and success weakened after three years.
Alicia (2002) argues that while strong cultures might help businesses in the short term, they can also hurt them in the long run by making it harder for them to change with the times.
Consequently, while a strong culture may boost short-term performance, it may also stifle an organization's long-term capacity for change, adaptation, and innovation.
The vitality of an organization's culture depends on how well its values and the employees' responses to various stimuli fit with one another (Olivier, 2009).
Strong cultures are characterised by widespread agreement on a common set of values and beliefs that has a major impact on how employees act in the workplace (John, 2006). It involves persuading and inspiring team members to perform in accordance with the organization's standards, and having everyone agree on the significance of the core values (Schein, 2004).
In organisations with weak cultures, employees aren't inspired to do their best work because they share no shared values, rituals, or other ties that may be used to rally them behind the company's strategic goals (John, 2006).
Cultural factors have long been recognised as crucial to an organization's success (Schein, 1992). Even though the basic principles of an organisation place an emphasis on dissent and innovation, Alicia (2002) argues that organisations with a strong culture generate clear and cohesive values and expect people to care and agree with those values (Flynn & Chatman, 2001).
According to Chatman (2002), successful businesses can benefit strategically from having strong cultures. Southwest Airlines, for instance, has outperformed its rivals over time because of its insistence on maintaining a low cost structure and a high level of customer satisfaction.
On the other hand, Denison (1990) proposed a model that singles out the following four aspects of an organization's culture: its mission, its consistency, its engagement, and its flexibility.
According to Denison's findings, successful businesses have cultures that excel in all four dimensions. Therefore, successful businesses typically have cultures that are both flexible and stable, with a high emphasis on consistency and predictability, and a strong emphasis on employee participation within the context of a common goal.
Concentration outward (Mission + Flexibility)
An organization's ability to absorb, analyse, and convert signals from its environment into internal behavioural changes that improve its chances of survival, growth, and development is central to the adaptation hypothesis (Denison, 1990).
According to Schein (1985), an organization's success hinges on its ability to manage its culture, which consists of a set of adaptive collective behavioural reactions.
By contrast, a mission gives an organisation direction and clarity by outlining its place in society and how its members' work fits into the bigger picture (Denison, 1990).
Consequently, a strong external focus is essential to the success of an organisation, and such an organisation is one that prioritises adapting and changing in response to the external environment and has clearly stated goals and objectives. Revenue, increase in sales, and market share are all factors that can be affected by a company's outward orientation (Denison, 2006).
A Concentrated Effort inward (Activity + Reliability)
Large numbers of people taking part in anything make everyone feel like they have some responsibility for making it succeed (Denison, 1990). By adhering to a commonly accepted set of views and values, a group's members are better equipped to work together effectively.
Part of maintaining coherence is articulating the core beliefs and practises that give a culture its strength. Consistency in fostering a strong corporate culture is a key factor in the success of businesses.
Greater quality, fewer defects, less rework, efficient resource usage, and happy workers are the results of an organization's emphasis on improving its own operations (Denison, 2006).
Agility to change and include others
It is important for businesses to be adaptable so that they can meet the needs of their customers and employees in today's ever-changing market. Greater product and service innovation, inventiveness, and rapid reaction to the requirements of consumers and workers are hallmarks of a flexible business (Denison, 2006).
Mission- and ideology-based stability.
Maintaining its mission and routines throughout time is a sign of a stable organisation. Strong business operations, excellent returns on assets and investments, and consistent revenue all indicate a solid firm (Denison, 2006).
Therefore, in order to be successful, a company must grasp these essential characteristics and fortify its culture. Staff alignment, which in turn strengthens organisational performance, leads to greater employee productivity and commitment, as argued by Barney (1986).
Gagliardi (1986) argued, on the other hand, that organisations with strong cultures may only undergo limited change due to members' aversion to modifying such organisations' deeply held and widely accepted beliefs.
In the 1950s, for instance, Westinghouse Electrical Company nearly went out of business due to internal opposition to their acquisition of a factory automation company. The failure was attributed to the company's culture, which was unable to successfully integrate an entrepreneurial organisational activity within a major, established American enterprise (Nohria, Dwyer, & Dalzell, 2002).
Having strong cultural norms may help a company succeed in the short term, but they may also stifle innovation in the long run. Alicia (2002), on the other hand, proposes that businesses with these issues might employ subcultures to increase their flexibility and spark new ideas.
Individual, cultural, and institutional factors all contribute to the formation of distinct social groups known as subcultures (Chatman, 2002). Group membership (departments, workgroups, teams), organisational hierarchy, professional and occupational affiliations, socio-demographic categories (sex, ethnicity, age, or nationality), and performance-related variables (commitment to the organisation, quality of work, etc.) can all contribute to the formation of distinct subcultures within an organisation (Trice & Beyer, 1993 quoted by Chatman, 2002)
Managers' blindness to the existence of subcultures, both current and future, was highlighted as a problem by Hofstede (1998).
As was noted before, people who are a part of companies with strong cultures may be resistant to change. The value of an organization's culture can persist even after this dispute has been absorbed by one of its subcultures. Therefore, subcultures may provide a means by which organisations with a robust culture can be adaptable to new circumstances (Chatman, 2002).
A leader's ability to affect or change the culture of an organisation is emphasised by Bryman (1992). According to Weese (1995), "leaders have tempered positions relative to the impact that a leader can have on shaping and preserving the culture of an organisation," because "the culture is the organisation," rather than "something that the organisation possesses," making culture change a challenging task.
In order to create and sustain an effective company culture, transformational leaders are essential (Schein, 1993). Strong corporate cultures are a hallmark of highly transformative leaders, and these leaders put more effort into culture-building activities, notably the customer-orientation function, than other leaders (Weese, 1995).
Organizational success, according to Bass and Avolio (1992), also requires a transformative leadership style and a strong company culture. According to Yukl (1994), transformational leadership is "the process of influencing substantial changes in the attitudes and assumptions of organisational members and establishing commitment to the organization's mission, objectives, and strategies."
Organizational success depends on leaders' ability to foster a culture that encourages and facilitates goal attainment, collaborative teamwork, a focus on customers, and adaptability to change.
It's been proven that a company's culture may make a big difference in how well it does business. There is a correlation between an organization's performance and its culture, with the former achieving greater results than the latter. Organizational performance depends on a number of factors, including mission, consistency, engagement, and adaptability (Denison, 2006). Leaders who can effect change in their organisations must also have a robust corporate culture.
While strong organisational cultures can be a hindrance to innovation and adaptation, they can be overcome with the help of subcultures (Chatman, 2002).
Our academic professionals are here to help you with the management assignment help. From short essay proposals to complete assignments, we offer a service to suit your demands.
